yiwenchen
2018-02-06 08:10:38 UTC
Hi,
I found that dnsmasq doesn't reply dhcpv6 relay-forward packets after applying the patch of CVE-2017-14494.
It seems like the boundary check in the patch is wrong.
The following commit should fix the problem.
Could you please help confirm the issue?
Thank you very much.
---
src/rfc3315.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/rfc3315.c b/src/rfc3315.c
index c3c1c95..99b310a 100644
--- a/src/rfc3315.c
+++ b/src/rfc3315.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int dhcp6_maybe_relay(struct state *state, void *inbuff, size_t sz,
for (opt = opts; opt; opt = opt6_next(opt, end))
{
- if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) >= end) {
+ if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) > end) {
return 0;
}
int o = new_opt6(opt6_type(opt));
--
1.9.1
Best Regards,
Yiwen
I found that dnsmasq doesn't reply dhcpv6 relay-forward packets after applying the patch of CVE-2017-14494.
It seems like the boundary check in the patch is wrong.
The following commit should fix the problem.
Could you please help confirm the issue?
Thank you very much.
---
src/rfc3315.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/rfc3315.c b/src/rfc3315.c
index c3c1c95..99b310a 100644
--- a/src/rfc3315.c
+++ b/src/rfc3315.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int dhcp6_maybe_relay(struct state *state, void *inbuff, size_t sz,
for (opt = opts; opt; opt = opt6_next(opt, end))
{
- if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) >= end) {
+ if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) > end) {
return 0;
}
int o = new_opt6(opt6_type(opt));
--
1.9.1
Best Regards,
Yiwen